History of the DR of Congo


 

 
Home
Project Overview
Background
   Electronics
   Inside Mobile
   Coltan
   the DR of Congo
   Habitat Loss
   Threatened Species
   Civil War
   Human Rights
Teaching Resources
Links
Contact Us




    

The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) with its 2,345,410 square kilometres is the third largest country of Africa and the 12th in the world. It is situated in the central part of the continent.

The area known as the DRC was initially occupied by Pygmies. From 2000 BC a migration dynamic brought people from other parts of Africa, mostly Bantu from the north-western.

 

In the 5th century some well structured societies started to emerge, with some of them well organized and highly developed politically, socially, and economically. These societies were in overall leading a very idealistic and peaceful living until the arrival of the European explorers and colonisers.

The area was delimited by the British born American journalist Sir Henry Morton Stanley who was hired by the King Leopold II of Belgium. This later acquired formally this large and extremely rich territory as his personal property in the Berlin conference, Germany, which was requested by Portugal and organized by Otto Von Bismarck.

The conference lasted three months, between 15 November 1884 and 25 February 1885, and saw the presence of ambassadors from fourteen European countries gathered around the major western powers of that time, initially tasked to settle the status of Congo River and Niger River mouths and basins and negotiate questions and confusions over the control of Africa. The King Leopold II emerged as a key figure in that forum where European powers divided up Africa like vultures and created a cultural mishmash and disruption of the well established structures of the African societies.

The Congolese people may be among the less fortunate people in the world. They have never enjoyed the good acquisition brought by the modernism, neither emancipation, nor durable peace resulting into a dignified life.  Since 1885, almost all successive powers, regimes and individuals that have ever administered this country have always imposed brutality, tyranny, exploitation, despotism, coercion, pillaging, Imperialism and subjugation, without mentioning slavery than hampered the population of its eastern part.

What makes this paradoxical is that in all these evil powers are identified by a similar characteristic in their drive: the use of mercenaries, massive human rights abuse, suppression of an important element of emancipation, mass killings, new name for the country without any consultation of the primary sovereign and adoption of well justified names.

Once Leopold II, pretending the profession of humanitarian objectives by creating and becoming chairman of the African International Association, and acquired the largest and richest estate never owned by a human in the world at the end of Berlin conference, he quickly gave the country the name of Congo Free State and created a special army force, known as Force Publique, full of mercenaries from other European states.  The aim of the force was to protect the country against enemies, who did not exist in reality.

He took advantage of the growing world rubber market with the development of the rubber tyres to make money by imposing and establishing a rubber collection quota and forced labour to the local people. The Force Publique was then called into rescue to impose and enforce the rubber quota and ivory collection by brutalizing these poor people. They went far by setting up the policy and widespread practice of cutting off the limbs of the natives, burning and cleansing out villages as a matter of enforcing these quotas, among many other evildoing.

An international outcry was then raised up. By the time international pressure compelled the Belgian government, in a move to preserve the dignity of their nation, to adopt the so called Congo Free State from Leopold II in 1908, about 23 millions of people had been murdered. That was a significant catalyst for the first human right movement in the world. There never been anything justifying the name Congo Free State, neither any philanthropically oriented action sustaining the adoption of the name African International Association.

Although the Belgian administration gave it a new name i.e. Belgian Congo little changed in the life of the local people. It was just a change of masters not of practice, as people were still denied a significant element of emancipation which democracy. Though the country generated too much income that structurally developed Belgium and bore the name Belgian as it attribute, things were very different with the metropolis. The livelihood of the Congolese did not improve at all. It was just a total exploitation, massive oppression, human rights abuse, coercion and subjugation.

This led to the struggle for the independence.

Leopold II’s inhumane practices are well stereotyped by the invading Rwandese army and their ally, the puppet rebel movement known as the Rally for the Congolese Democracy (RCD).

In fact there’s nothing at all related to democracy in the area invaded by Rwanda and its ally.

As there’s a rush for coltan these later have impoverished the area whereby people have got no alternative than to dig for coltan for survival (paying some of their mined coltan quantity as a royalty to the Rwandese and the rebellion). Unless someone is able to pay the forced tax in cash, failure to mine it attracts persecution similar to the kind of what was imposed by the Belgian king: like killing or limb cut out. This is enforced by the so called rebellion and the patented plunderer, the Rwanda.

Apart from as a matter of fact, people has to mine it in order to get food and meet other essential needs; the mined coltan is bought at very low price, but sold out in astronomical price, maintaining the Congolese people in continual and appalling condition.

Schools were destroyed, thus forcing children to go for coltan, to be recruited as soldiers and to practice prostitution. This is a blatant example of subjugation and coercion.

The rush for coltan is comparable to the rush for gold; the only difference is that the two rushes happened in different moment of the world history, and under different social, geographical and economical backgrounds. If the dynamism accompanying the rush for the Congolese coltan is different to that one of the USA and the Australian gold rush it is because the world has become politicised than it was before. Before poor and disadvantaged people were the one to benefit more from gold rushes; but now in the coltan rush richer and influential individuals, corporate bodies, powerful multinational company and nations are the ones to capitalize.

The DRC’s coltan rush is just an obvious showcase.

 

References:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Force_Publique

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Republic_of_the_Congo

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congo_Free_State

http://www.worldatlas.com

 




© 2005 All Rights Reserved.