How little brains solve big problems in termite colonies
Non-monogamy and colony inheritance are the leading causes of conflict among termites, but these social cockroaches prove you don’t always need a big brain to get to the bottom of even the curliest of problems peacefully, new research from Charles Darwin University (CDU) has found.
Study author Judith Korb, a CDU and University of Freiburg researcher, investigated a termite species found in Darwin and its mangroves to analyse which mechanisms these invertebrates have evolved to resolve conflict.
Dr Korb said termites rarely address conflict with aggression – more often, problems are resolved indirectly.
For example, she said in cases of non-monogamous colonies with limited resources, termites turn to nepotism to keep their closest kin fed and healthy.
“Non-monogamy among termites usually occurs when a colony is founded by more than one breeding pair or if ‘new blood’ is brought in due to fusion with neighbouring colonies,” she said.
“In a situation where there’s multiple kings and queens – non-monogamy – and limited food, that’s where nepotism comes in as a source of conflict.
“But when there’s an abundance of food, they more or less don’t care if there’s multiple kings and queens and they feed all nestmates regardless of how close they are related.”
Alternatively, termites turn to direct conflict – butting and biting – when colony inheritance causes tension in a community.
Dr Korb said worker termites could become the new king or queen when the previous one died, with those who show the most dominant behaviour inheriting the breeding position.
However, they will only successfully establish themselves as royals if they feed their nestmate workers a lot – if not, they are killed.
“This ensures only very fit individuals that are in good physiological conditions will become the new king or queen,” she said.
Dr Korb said it was important to understand the conflicts and resolutions of creatures such as termites because the evolutionary principles that underlie their conflict hold lessons for us as humans.
“For example, there is conflict among human siblings just as there is among termite siblings – though such tension in the former is nowadays more related to resources rather than reproduction,” she said.
“By analysing the plights of termites, we learn which mechanisms can evolve to solve conflicts among small-brained species so they can live together socially.
“I find it exciting how evolution always finds a way, and you don’t need a large brain to solve conflicts. I even think, we as humans don’t use our brains very often to solve problems but react emotionally instead.”
Cooperation and conflict in termite societies was published in Current Opinion in Insect Science.
Related Articles
CDU student becomes first City of Sydney international student ambassador
For the first time a Charles Darwin University (CDU) student has been accepted into the award-winning City of Sydney International student leadership and ambassador (ISLA) program.
Read more about CDU student becomes first City of Sydney international student ambassador
Shell yeah: PhD project gives critical insights into vulnerable species
A study into the foraging habits of green turtles in the Northern Territory has used an innovative surveying technique which could become a critical tool in monitoring marine habitats in remote and challenging environments.
Read more about Shell yeah: PhD project gives critical insights into vulnerable species
Location-specific solutions needed to manage heat in global climate crisis
Place-specific strategies for adapting to increasing temperatures are crucial to keeping remote towns and communities across Northern Australia habitable, according to a recent study on the future impacts of climate change-intensified heat on people in the geographic edges of Australia.
Read more about Location-specific solutions needed to manage heat in global climate crisis