Skip to main content
You are viewing this website as a Domestic Student You are viewing this website as an International Student

You are viewing this website as a Domestic Student

You are viewing this website as an International Student

Domestic Student

I am an Australian or New Zealand citizen.

I am an Australian Permanent Resident (including Humanitarian Visa holders).

International Student

I am not a citizen of Australia or New Zealand.

I am not an Australian permanent resident or Humanitarian Visa holders.

Start of main content

‘AI is not intelligent at all’: Why our dignity is at risk

Maria Randazzo
Dr Maria Randazzo has found AI reshaped Western legal and ethical landscapes at unprecedented speed.

The age of artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed our interactions, but threatens human dignity on a worldwide scale, according to a study led by Charles Darwin University (CDU).

Study lead author Dr Maria Randazzo, an academic from CDU’s School of Law, found the technology was reshaping Western legal and ethical landscapes at unprecedented speed but was undermining democratic values and deepening systemic biases.

Dr Randazzo said current regulation failed to prioritise fundamental human rights and freedoms such as privacy, anti-discrimination, user autonomy, and intellectual property rights – mainly thanks to the untraceable nature of many algorithmic models.

Calling this lack of transparency a “black box problem”, Dr Randazzo said decisions made by deep-learning or machine-learning processes were impossible for humans to trace, making it difficult for users to determine if and why an AI model has violated their rights and dignity and seek justice where necessary.

“This is a very significant issue that is only going to get worse without adequate regulation,” Dr Randazzo said.

AI is not intelligent in any human sense at all. It is a triumph in engineering, not in cognitive behaviour. 

“It has no clue what it’s doing or why – there’s no thought process as a human would understand it, just pattern recognition stripped of embodiment, memory, empathy, or wisdom.”

Currently, the world’s three dominant digital powers – the United States, China, and the European Union – are taking markedly different approaches to AI, leaning on market-centric, state-centric, and human-centric models respectively. 

Dr Randazzo said the EU’s human-centric approach is the preferred path to protect human dignity but without a global commitment to this goal, even that approach falls short.

“Globally, if we don't anchor AI development to what makes us human – our capacity to choose, to feel, to reason with care, to empathy and compassion – we risk creating systems that devalue and flatten humanity into data points, rather than improve the human condition,” she said.

“Humankind must not be treated as a means to an end.”

Human dignity in the age of Artificial Intelligence: an overview of legal issues and regulatory regimes was published in the Australian Journal of Human Rights.

The paper is the first in a trilogy Dr Randazzo will produce on the topic.

Related Articles

  • Dr Rakesh Gupta

    Red tape and regulations: A powerful weapon in new economic reality, study finds

    The global financial order has entered a new, shifting and disruptive era of nationalism and these changes lay bare the difference between the haves and have nots, according to a new study with Charles Darwin University. 

    Read more about Red tape and regulations: A powerful weapon in new economic reality, study finds
  • The striped catfish is a cornerstone species of Vietnam's aquaculture industry. Provided by Sunil Kadri

    AI-powered disease prediction to improve catfish production

    Artificial Intelligence will be harnessed to detect disease outbreaks in striped catfish ponds in Vietnam's Mekong Delta, in a new international project to help safeguard the country's aquaculture industry.  

    Read more about AI-powered disease prediction to improve catfish production
  • Man sitting on desk surrounded by books in a light filled room.

    Study reveals gaps in stuttering assessment and treatment

    Variability in an individual’s stuttering pattern has long posed challenges for speech-language pathologists (SLPs) when treating clients, but new research led by Charles Darwin University (CDU) and Michigan State University (MSU) has identified the gaps in clinical practices and how to address them. 

    Read more about Study reveals gaps in stuttering assessment and treatment
Back to top